In March 2002, the American Medical Association (AMA) announced plans to lobby lawmakers and courts in at least 25 states and mount an ad campaign to raise support for limits on injured patients’ rights to sue for malpractice, arguing that malpractice lawsuits are the cause of our nation’s health care problems. Yet many within the medical profession disagree with the AMA’s message:
Dr. Richard G. Roberts, chairman of the American Academy of Family Physicians and professor of Family Medicine at the University of Wisconsin Medical School, has issued his “Top 10 Myths of Medical Malpractice” in which he lists 10 “Truths” about the civil justice system, including:
Donald Palmisano, then president-elect of the 300,000-member American Medical Association, who founded a company that tells doctors how to avoid malpractice suits, has drawn criticism from members of the medical community. Palmisano has written, “Although the physician may aspire to give the best care, the law does not require the best,” and “The law requires a minimally acceptable level of care, thus my analogy to the ‘low hurdle.’” (Ceci Connolly, “AMA Officer Sparks Ethics Debate; Doctor-Lawyer’s Business Advises on How to Avoid Malpractice Suits,” Washington Post, June 15, 2002.)
Dr. William M. Sage, professor at Columbia Law School, writes in “Putting the Patient in Patient Safety,” in the June 12, 2002, issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association :
Dr. Wayne Cohen, who in 1995 was medical director of Bronx Municipal Hospital, said, “The city was spending so much money defending obstetrics suits, they just made a decision that it would be cheaper to hire people who knew what they were doing.” ( Dean Baquet and Jane Fritsch, “New York’s Public Hospitals Fail, and Babies Are the Victims,” New York Times, March 5, 1995.)
In 1985, the director of Maternal/Fetal Medicine at Pasadena’s Huntington Memorial Hospital told the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “The greatest cause of malpractice is malpractice. You must understand that some of the malpractice out there is so grievous, offensive and implausible as to beggar the imagination.” ( Letter from Ralph Nader to Florida Speaker Mills and Senate President Vogt (1988).)
AND A WORD FROM AN INSURANCE INDUSTRY LOBBYIST …
In a New York Times column called “Crushed by My Own Reform,” written on October 7, 1994, Frank Cornelius, former lobbyist with the Insurance Institute of Indiana, wrote, “In 1989, I underwent routine arthroscopic surgery after injuring my left knee in a fall.” As a result of a series of catastrphoic incidents of malpractice, Cornelius continued, “I am confined to a wheelchair and need a respirator to keep breathing. I have not been able to work. I have continuous physical pain in my legs and feet.… Twice, I have received last rites from my church. My marriage is ending, and the emotional fallout on our five children has been difficult to witness, to say the least. At the age of 49, I am told that I have less than two years to live.
“In 1975, I helped persuade the Indiana Legislature to pass what was acclaimed as a pioneering reform of the medical malpractice laws: a $ 500,000 cap on damage awards, and elimination of all damages for pain and suffering. I argued successfully that such limits would reduce health-care costs and encourage physicians to stay in Indiana — the same sort of arguments that now underpin the medical industry's call for national malpractice reform.
“Today, from my wheelchair, I rue that accomplishment.”
Americans for Insurance Reform, 90 Broad St., Suite 401, New York, NY 10004; Phone: 212/267-2801; Fax: 212/764-4298
(AIR is a project of the Center for Justice & Democracy)