Center for Justice and Democracy
90 Broad Street, Suite 401
New York, New York 10004
www.centerjd.org | centerjd@centerjd.org
212.267.2801


New England Journal of Medicine:
The Legal System Works!


The oft-repeated political argument for restricting patients’ legal rights is that undeserving patients are overburdening the system with too many “frivolous” medical malpractice lawsuits.1  However, on May 11, 2006, the New England Journal of Medicine published a definitive study that debunks this myth once and for all.2 

As summed up in Harvard’s release accompanying the article, “the new study by researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health and Brigham and Women’s Hospital challenges the view that frivolous litigation is rampant and expensive.” 

Among the study's findings:

“Portraits of a malpractice system that is stricken with frivolous litigation are overblown.”

The vast majority of resources go toward resolving and paying claims that involve errors.  “Disputing and paying for errors account for the lion’s share of malpractice costs.”

Most instances of medical malpractice do not result in a lawsuit.  “Previous research has established that the great majority of patients who sustain a medical injury as a result of negligence do not sue. … [F]ailure to pay claims involving error adds to a larger phenomenon of underpayment generated by the vast number of negligent injuries that never surface as claims.” 

Few claims result in court trial and with regard to those that do, juries are conservative.  

 

May 2006.

________________________________


1 As recently as a May 1, 2006, President Bush complained about “the glut of frivolous lawsuits that are driving good doctors out of practice and driving up the cost of health care.” “REMARKS BY PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH AT THE AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE,” May 1, 2006.

2 David M. Studdert, Michelle Mello, et al. “Claims, Errors, and Compensation Payments in Medical Malpractice Litigation,” New England Journal of Medicine, May 11, 2006.